The Calgary police force is recruiting British police officers, CBC news reports.
This story is interesting because it discusses the British recruit's perceptions of Canadian society. A bit more historical context would have been welcome, however, for the story fails to mention that it was once fairly common for Canadian police forces (most notably the RCMP) to recruit officers in the British Isles.
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Canadian To Get DFC
A Canadian, Christopher Hasler who enlisted in the RAF will be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, the highest honour within the RAF. The presentation ceremony with take place at Buckingham Palace.
According to the CanWest story on him, Hasler joined the RAF because he had been rejected by the Canadian Forces.
According to the CanWest story on him, Hasler joined the RAF because he had been rejected by the Canadian Forces.
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Beaverbrook Gallery Controversy
Nice article in Saturday's Globe re the Beaverbrook gallery controversy (backstory on the controversy: Lord Beaverbrook's descendants wish to take back some of the painting the Beaverbrook donated to a gallery in New Brunswick. The gallery claims they can't do this and the issue is before a mediator). I'm mainly interested in the story because Beaverbrook enters into my research a fair bit.
Article in La Presse on Scottish Independence
David McCrone, a political scientist at the University of Edinburgh, has an interesting article in Saturday's La Presse on Scottish independence, a topic with obvious parallels to the Quebec situation. McCrone, it should be pointed out, disputes the recent polling figures showing that a majority of Scots favour independence, noting that the 51% figures come from a poll commissioned by the right-wing Daily Telegraph. (Canadian readers: the Daily Telegraph is like the National Post, except that its readers think that fox hunting is good for the fox).
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Dual Citizenship Tempest
The teapot tempest over Dion's dual citizenship continues. A positive side-effect of this controversy may be that Canadians learn something about their citizenship law and that this may prove to be a "teachable moment". I recently read a letter to the editor on the issue of Dion's nationality that claimed that Sir John A. Macdonald was a dual citizen, a comment that reveals a gross ignorance of the history of Canadian citizenship law (and of Canadian history more generally). I know not all Grade 9 history classes are created equal, but you would think that a reasonable intelligent person would remember that until after the Second World War, Canadians were legally British subjects (Macdonald was a British subject, but so was Cartier. In fact, if you don't understand this basic fact, so many things about Canadian history and heritage don't make sense-- e.g., why is there a Crown on Ontario licence plates).
The Toronto Star has an excellent article today that mentions the creation of Canadian citizenship in the 1940s (it also discusses John Turner's British birth).
There is a great deal of popular mythology surrounding Mackenzie King's decision to create a separate Canadian citizenship that distinguished Canadians from other subjects of the Empire/Commonwealth. One widespread idea is that the decision was somehow linked to the move to racial and ethnic equality within Canada. The reality is quite different: historically, the Tories, the imperialist party in Canada, were somewhat more tolerant of non-white immigration than the Liberals, the party that tried to detach Canada from the Empire/Commonwealth as much as a possible.
Canadian citizenship was created at precisely the moment non-whites were starting to use their status as British subjects to settle in the UK (until 1961, pretty much any healthy person from the Commonwealth could move to Britain without restriction). Although Canada eventually opened its doors to non-white immigration from the Commonwealth, it did so because of pressure from Britain (especially Harold Macmillan), the need to curry favour within the Commonwealth, and because Diefenbaker's Conservatives saw no conflict between anglophilia and a strong committment to racial equality. In the 1950s, black organizations such as Montreal's Negro Citizenship Association's attempted to have Canada's definition of British subject broadened to include black West Indians--- Ottawa was indifferent to their claims and was focused on recruiting whites immigrants in continental Europe.
The Toronto Star has an excellent article today that mentions the creation of Canadian citizenship in the 1940s (it also discusses John Turner's British birth).
There is a great deal of popular mythology surrounding Mackenzie King's decision to create a separate Canadian citizenship that distinguished Canadians from other subjects of the Empire/Commonwealth. One widespread idea is that the decision was somehow linked to the move to racial and ethnic equality within Canada. The reality is quite different: historically, the Tories, the imperialist party in Canada, were somewhat more tolerant of non-white immigration than the Liberals, the party that tried to detach Canada from the Empire/Commonwealth as much as a possible.
Canadian citizenship was created at precisely the moment non-whites were starting to use their status as British subjects to settle in the UK (until 1961, pretty much any healthy person from the Commonwealth could move to Britain without restriction). Although Canada eventually opened its doors to non-white immigration from the Commonwealth, it did so because of pressure from Britain (especially Harold Macmillan), the need to curry favour within the Commonwealth, and because Diefenbaker's Conservatives saw no conflict between anglophilia and a strong committment to racial equality. In the 1950s, black organizations such as Montreal's Negro Citizenship Association's attempted to have Canada's definition of British subject broadened to include black West Indians--- Ottawa was indifferent to their claims and was focused on recruiting whites immigrants in continental Europe.
Friday, December 8, 2006
Dion Citizenship Controversy
I'm posting a link to a friend's blog: Red and White Shirt has some interesting things to say about the Dion citizenship controversy. There is a reference to John Turner's birth in England (that's the tangential link to the British World theme of this blog).
http://redwhiteshirt.blogspot.com/2006/12/citizen-dion.html
http://redwhiteshirt.blogspot.com/2006/12/citizen-dion.html
Thursday, December 7, 2006
Stephane Dion
Nowadays, it is rare for a British paper to notice political events in Canada, but the left-leaning Guardian carried a story on the Liberal leadership convention in Montreal.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1963317,00.html
Unfortunately, they mistakenly said that Stephane Dion was a former Canadian PM! To their credit, the Guardian printed a retraction once the error was pointed out.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1963317,00.html
Unfortunately, they mistakenly said that Stephane Dion was a former Canadian PM! To their credit, the Guardian printed a retraction once the error was pointed out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)